Статья 'On the Way from Metaphysics of Time to Atemporal Metaphysics: Exploring Some Difficulties of Ontology' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Меню журнала
> Архив номеров > Рубрики > О журнале > Авторы > О журнале > Требования к статьям > Редсовет > Редакция > Порядок рецензирования статей > Политика издания > Ретракция статей > Этические принципы > Политика открытого доступа > Оплата за публикации в открытом доступе > Online First Pre-Publication > Политика авторских прав и лицензий > Политика цифрового хранения публикации > Политика идентификации статей > Политика проверки на плагиат
Журналы индексируются
Реквизиты журнала

ГЛАВНАЯ > Вернуться к содержанию
Философия и культура
Правильная ссылка на статью:

On the Way from Metaphysics of Time to Atemporal Metaphysics: Exploring Some Difficulties of Ontology

Зима Вадим Николаевич

доктор философских наук

профессор, кафедра "Гуманитарные дисциплины", ФГБОУ ВПО «Московский политехнический университет»

127550, Россия, г. Москва, ул. Павла Корчагина, 22, оф. 447

Zima Vadim Nikolaevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the Department of Humanities, Moscow Polytech

127550, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Pavla Korchagina, 22, of. 447

vadim-zima@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2013.11.9632

Дата направления статьи в редакцию:

18-12-1969


Дата публикации:

1-5.28-2013


Аннотация: The explication and the analysis of some basic difficulties which realization of the project of «atemporal physics and metaphysics» in modern philosophy and a science faces is undertaken. It is shown, that key idea of the given project is attempt of representation of the objective reality (or so-called «the ultimate reality») as reality that is timeless at its fundamental level. The question on the ontological status of concepts of "time" and «the ultimate reality» from the point of view of the ontology of sciences is analyzed. Conclusion that concepts of "time", from one hand, and «the ultimate reality», from other hand, when latter one is considered as a synonym of the objective reality, are ontologically incompatible, is supposed. Ontological resources of the interdisciplinary approach to the problem of time in a context of the question of "the ultimate reality» are explored. Some ontological criteria for the objectification of time in the ontology of science and metaphysics are formulated. Heuristic potential of the thesis of "Realism", as the fundamental metaphysical premise of a science, for the decision of a question on the nature of «the ultimate reality» and its temporal features is shown. Some difficulties connected with terminological aspect of a problem of elaborating of «atemporal metaphysics are analyzed.


Ключевые слова:

atemporal metaphysics, timelessness, metaphysics of time, time: interdisciplinary researches, philosophy of science, time, eternity, ultimate reality, ontology of science, objective reality

Библиография
1. Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. – Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001. – 272 p.
2. Einstein A. Maxwell’s Influence on the Development of the Conception of Physical Reality / James Clerk Maxwell: A Commemoration Volume. Cambridge University Press, 1931. – P. 66-73.
3. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig Callender. – N.Y., 2002. – P. 293-316.
4. Maximi confessoris. Ambiguorum Liber // PG. 91. Col. 1031-1418.
5. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. – N.Y., 1996. – xiii+306 p.
6. Sorabji R. Time, creation and the continuum: theories in antique and the early middle ages. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1983. – 473 p.
7. Stenger V.J. Timeless Reality: Symmetry, Simplicity, and Multiple Universes. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2000. – 396 p.
References
1. Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. – Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001. – 272 p.
2. Einstein A. Maxwell’s Influence on the Development of the Conception of Physical Reality / James Clerk Maxwell: A Commemoration Volume. Cambridge University Press, 1931. – P. 66-73.
3. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig Callender. – N.Y., 2002. – P. 293-316.
4. Maximi confessoris. Ambiguorum Liber // PG. 91. Col. 1031-1418.
5. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. – N.Y., 1996. – xiii+306 p.
6. Sorabji R. Time, creation and the continuum: theories in antique and the early middle ages. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1983. – 473 p.
7. Stenger V.J. Timeless Reality: Symmetry, Simplicity, and Multiple Universes. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2000. – 396 p.
Ссылка на эту статью

Просто выделите и скопируйте ссылку на эту статью в буфер обмена. Вы можете также попробовать найти похожие статьи


Другие сайты издательства:
Официальный сайт издательства NotaBene / Aurora Group s.r.o.