SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Abgarjan D. —
The Place of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
– 2014. – № 4.
– С. 307 - 315.
DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2014.4.11624 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=11624
The Place of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea
Abgarjan Dzhetta
other
post-graduate student, кафедра international law, Moscow State Institute of International Relations
125993, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 76.
Abgaryan Dzhetta
postgraduate student, Department of International Law, the Moscow State Institute for International Relations
Аннотация: The author of this presentation sees it her task to find out, whether the ITLOS has helped to systematize the law of the sea, to make its rules more clear and obligations of states stemming therefrom more precise. The methodology of this paper is to undertake the analysis of the following questions: to begin with the general capacity of international courts to promote development of international law; then to light up the special place of ITLOS in the development of the law of the sea; to analyze the work by ITLOS on the law of the sea rules in different spheres of the ocean activity case by case; and to conclude. A very special place occupied by the International Tribunal for the of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea is dicussed in the article. It is submitted that ITLOS follows the ways and methods of the ICJ in the process. No other judicial body is capable to analize in detail rules of the law of the sea neither can influence positions of states.
Ключевые слова:
International Tribunal, progressive development, international law, ICJ, international judicial bodies, ITLOS, rules, positions of states, influence, the Sea
Ginsburg T. Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, in: Virginia Journal of International Law. Va. J. Int'l L. V.45, Spring, 2005.P.638.
Sohn L. В.Problems of dispute settlement // Law of the sea: conference outcomes and problems of implementation. Proceedings of the law of the sea Institute tenth annual conference. Cambridge (Mass.), 1977. P. 223—232.
Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
Irwin P. C. Settlement of maritime boundary disputes. An analysis of the law of the sea negotiations // Ocean Dev. and internat. L. 1980. Vol. 8. P. 105—148.
А. А. Тодоров. Территориальный элемент состава пиратства по уголовному законодательству России и зарубежных стран // Право и политика. – 2012. – № 10. – С. 104-107.
М. Р. Хубиева. Конкуренция юрисдикций в случае предписания временных мер правовой защиты при разрешении международных морских споров // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 104-107.
С. Н. Овчинников. Пограничный контроль морских судов в Российской Федерации: законодательство и практика // Право и политика. – 2011. – № 12. – С. 104-107.
М. М. Каленченко. Территориальная охрана морской среды и свобода судоходства. // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.
Е. Б. Ганюшкина. Международный орган по морскому дну, Комиссия по границам континентального шельфа, Международный трибунал по морскому праву и некоторые другие международные объединения,связанные с Конвенцией ООН по морскому праву 1982 г. // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
Каламкарян Р.А. Роль Международного Суда ООН в деле поддержания международного правопорядка // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 1.-С.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
Каламкарян Р.А. Включенность Российской Федерации в деятельность Международного Суда ООН в деле обеспечения международной законности и правопорядка // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 2.-С.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
Кузьмина Ю.А. Некоторые особенности практики Европейского Суда в отношении Российской Федерации // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 3.-С.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.htm
Ginsburg T. Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, in: Virginia Journal of International Law. Va. J. Int'l L. V.45, Spring, 2005.P.638.
Sohn L. V.Problems of dispute settlement // Law of the sea: conference outcomes and problems of implementation. Proceedings of the law of the sea Institute tenth annual conference. Cambridge (Mass.), 1977. P. 223—232.
Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
Irwin P. C. Settlement of maritime boundary disputes. An analysis of the law of the sea negotiations // Ocean Dev. and internat. L. 1980. Vol. 8. P. 105—148.
A. A. Todorov. Territorial'nyi element sostava piratstva po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
M. R. Khubieva. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsii v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoi zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
S. N. Ovchinnikov. Pogranichnyi kontrol' morskikh sudov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: zakonodatel'stvo i praktika // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
M. M. Kalenchenko. Territorial'naya okhrana morskoi sredy i svoboda sudokhodstva. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.
V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
E. B. Ganyushkina. Mezhdunarodnyi organ po morskomu dnu, Komissiya po granitsam kontinental'nogo shel'fa, Mezhdunarodnyi tribunal po morskomu pravu i nekotorye drugie mezhdunarodnye ob''edineniya,svyazannye s Konventsiei OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
