Статья 'Коллизионное регулирование договорных обязательств в штате Орегон (США)' - журнал 'Law and Politics' - NotaBene.ru
по
Меню журнала
> Архив номеров > Рубрики > О журнале > Авторы > Требования к статьям > Политика издания > Редакция журнала > Порядок рецензирования статей > Редакционный совет > Ретракция статей > Этические принципы > О журнале > Политика открытого доступа > Оплата за публикации в открытом доступе > Online First Pre-Publication > Политика авторских прав и лицензий > Политика цифрового хранения публикации > Политика идентификации статей > Политика проверки на плагиат
Журналы индексируются
Реквизиты журнала
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Коллизионное регулирование договорных обязательств в штате Орегон (США)

Getman-Pavlova Irina

PhD in Law

Scientific editor, "Law" journal of the Higher School of Economics; Docent, National Research University "Higher School of Economics", department of International Public and Private Law

101000, Russia, Moscow, Myasnitskaya Street 20

getmanpav@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Kalugina Svetlana

Master's degree, National Research University "Higher School of Economis", department of International Public and Private Law

101000, Russia, Moscow, Myasnitskaya Street 20

kaluginasveta@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2015.4.42726

Received:

01-01-2013


Published:

22-04-2015


Abstract: The Russian law doctrine practically has no research on the statutory legislation on Private International Law (PIL) of the United States, even though this country did participate in the global processes of codification of PIL. The subject of this research is the legislative act of the State of Oregon on the choice of law to be applied towards the contractual obligations (2001, rev. 2013). This act codifies the precedent of the State of Oregon; the structure of the act reflects its “judicial orientation”, meant to serve as a guide for the judges. At the same time, the act is “scientifically oriented”, and its positions reproduce the most successful doctrinal experience of American Choice-of-Law Revolution. The authors conclude that the rules of the act are based on the synthesis of flexible choice-of-law approaches and certain norms. Oregon’s legislators were able to achieve the optimal balance between flexibility and predictability of the choice-of-law regulation of contracts.


Keywords:

conflict approach, choice-of-law rules, Private International Law, the USA, Oregon, codification, contractual obligations, conflict regulation, the American choice-of-law Revolution, statutory legislation

References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Другие сайты издательства:
Официальный сайт издательства NotaBene / Aurora Group s.r.o.